Ideas drive history. But not just any ideas, magnetic ideas. Ideas so charismatic that people devote their lives to them.
In his 1999 book, “The Real American Dream,” Andrew Delbanco described the different ideas that, at different stages, drove American history. The first stage in our history was driven by a belief in God. The Pilgrims came because God called them to do so. God’s plans for humanity were to be completed on this continent.
The second phase, through the 19th century, was organized around Nation. The pioneers were settling the West. It was the age of American exceptionalism. America was to be a universal nation, a home and model for all humankind, the last best hope of earth.
The third phase, from 1960 to today, was organized around Self. Each individual should throw off constraints. The best life was the life of maximum self-expression, self-actualization and maximum personal freedom, economic as well as lifestyle.
We are now leaving the era of Self. The right and left now offer two different magnetic ideas. The Trumpian right offers Tribe. “Our” kind of people are under threat from “their” kind of people. We need to erect walls, build barriers and fight. The earlier American nationalism was about frontier; this is about the fortress. Tribalism is a magnetic idea that has mobilized people from time immemorial.
The left offers the idea of Social Justice. The left tells stories of oppression. The story of America is the story of class, racial and gender oppression. The mission now is to rise up and destroy the systems of oppression. This, too, is an electric idea.
The problem with today’s left-wing and right-wing ideas is that they are both based on a scarcity mind-set. They are based upon us/them, friend/enemy, politics is war, life is conflict.
They are both based on the fantasy that the other half of America can be conquered, and when it disappears we can get everything we want. They are both based on the idea that if we can just concentrate enough power in the centralized authoritarian state, then we can ram through the changes we seek.
So a lot of us reject these two ideas. A lot of us don’t want to live in a war society, whether it’s a tribal war or a class war. If the 2020 choice is between Donald Trump and a Democrat who supports the Green New Deal, I’d vote for any moderate alternative.
The problem with moderates has always been that they don’t have a magnetic idea. Recent moderation has been a bland porridge that defines itself by what it doesn’t like.
It doesn’t have to be that way.
What is the core problem facing America today? It is division: The growing gaps between rich and poor, rural and urban, educated and less educated, black and white, left and right.
What big idea counteracts division, fragmentation, alienation? It is found in Leviticus and Matthew: Love your neighbor. Today’s left and right are fueled by anger and seek conflict. The big idea for moderates should be solidarity, fraternity, conversation across difference. A moderate agenda should magnify our affections for one another.
There are four affections that bind our society, and moderates could champion a policy agenda for each:
We are bound together by our love of our children. The first mission is to promote policies to make sure children are enmeshed in webs of warm relationships: child tax credits, early childhood education, parental leave, schools that emphasize social and emotional learning.
We are bound to society by our work. The second mission is to help people find vocations through which they can serve the community: wage subsidies, apprenticeship tracks, subsidies to help people move to opportunity, work councils, which are clubs that would offer workers lifelong training and representation.
We are bound together by our affection for our place. The third mission is to devolve power out of Washington to the local level. Out-radicalize the left and right by offering a different system of power, a system in which power is wielded by neighbors, who know their local context and trust one another. Create a national service program so that young people are paid to serve organizations in their community.
We are bound together by our shared humanity. The fourth mission is to embrace an immigration policy that balances welcome with cultural integration. It’s to champion housing and education policies that encourage racial integration. Neither left nor right talks much about racial integration anymore. But it is the prerequisite for national unity.
Moderation is not an ideology; it is a way of being. It stands for humility of the head and ardor in the heart. When you listen to your neighbor, you see how many perspectives there are and you’re intellectually humble in the face of that pluralism. When you listen to your neighbor, you see that deep down we’re the same and you hunger to deepen that connection.
Let the left and right stand for endless political war. The moderate seeks the beloved community. That, too, is a magnetic idea.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: email@example.com.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.B:
六和兴达饲料【怪】【不】【得】【凤】【儿】【跑】【了】【回】【来】。 【原】【来】【后】【面】【竟】【然】【追】【着】【一】【大】【堆】【的】【是】【赤】【眼】【黑】【甲】，【只】【是】【目】【测】【边】【足】【足】【上】【万】！ “【捅】【马】【蜂】【窝】【了】……” 【秦】【逸】【第】【一】【个】【反】【应】【便】【是】【如】【此】。 【原】【来】【凤】【儿】【跟】【去】【的】【地】【方】，【正】【是】【一】【个】【大】【的】**，【让】【制】【造】【好】【的】【赤】【眼】【黑】【甲】【先】【在】【那】【里】【等】【候】，【达】【到】【一】【定】【数】【量】【时】，【在】【一】【并】【往】【其】【它】【地】【方】【去】。 “【不】【用】【躲】，【直】【接】【杀】！” 【秦】【逸】【说】
【金】【兰】【挥】【了】【挥】【手】，【将】【老】【爸】、【老】【妈】【和】【爷】【爷】【他】【们】【的】【结】【界】【给】【撤】【了】。 【金】【母】【一】【个】【箭】【步】【跑】【到】【女】【儿】【的】【身】【边】，【一】【脸】【关】【心】【的】【问】【道】：“【兰】【兰】，【你】【现】【在】【怎】【么】【样】【了】？【头】【还】【痛】【不】？” 【金】【兰】【连】【忙】【摇】【摇】【头】【说】【道】：“【老】【妈】，【我】【没】【事】【儿】，【现】【在】【不】【疼】【了】。” 【金】【父】【也】【连】【忙】【关】【切】【的】【说】【道】：“【那】【就】【好】，【你】【没】【事】【就】【好】。【你】【觉】【得】【不】【舒】【服】【的】【话】，【就】【赶】【紧】【和】【我】【们】【说】，【你】
【得】【不】【到】【的】【并】【不】【一】【定】【都】【是】【好】【的】，【不】【想】【拥】【有】【的】【也】【未】【必】【都】【是】【坏】【的】。【左】【哲】【没】【有】【去】【看】【女】【人】【的】【眼】【睛】。【并】【不】【是】【左】【哲】【不】【敢】【与】【女】【人】【对】【视】，【而】【是】【左】【哲】【不】【愿】【意】【沉】【湎】【于】【极】【度】【的】【自】【私】【之】【中】。 【占】【有】【欲】【是】【人】【的】【本】【性】，【但】【却】【不】【应】【该】【被】【占】【有】【欲】【支】【配】。【如】【果】【什】【么】【都】【想】【得】【到】，【那】【就】【有】【可】【能】【什】【么】【都】【得】【不】【到】。 “【阿】【哲】，【你】【不】【爱】【我】【了】【吗】？”【女】【人】【嘤】【嘤】【的】【哭】【泣】【着】，【声】六和兴达饲料【按】【照】【叶】【辉】【对】【夜】【新】【欣】【的】【感】【情】【来】【说】，【他】【应】【该】【会】【在】【她】【出】【事】【的】【第】【一】【时】【间】【赶】【到】。【可】【如】【今】【手】【术】【都】【结】【束】【了】，【叶】【辉】【居】【然】【没】【来】【看】【她】。【这】【从】【哪】【个】【维】【度】【看】【都】【是】【一】【件】【不】【正】【常】【的】【事】【情】。 【于】【是】，【王】【心】【源】【把】【车】【停】【在】【路】【边】，【然】【后】【掏】【出】【手】【机】，【拨】【通】【了】Henry【的】【号】【码】。【电】【话】【响】【了】【两】【声】【后】【被】【接】【起】。 “D**id，【你】【还】【在】【医】【院】【里】【吗】？【新】【欣】【的】【情】【况】【怎】【么】【样】
【凉】【冰】【还】【告】【诉】【萧】【越】【白】，【原】【来】【凯】【莎】【在】【上】【一】【次】【联】【盟】【元】【首】【会】【议】【结】【束】【后】，【开】【始】【跟】【着】【自】【己】【继】【续】【符】【文】【之】【地】【的】【旅】【行】【前】。 【还】【特】【意】【找】【了】【一】【下】【鹤】【熙】，【让】【她】【将】【自】【己】【几】【个】【人】【的】【手】【机】【给】【加】【装】【了】【一】【个】【可】【以】【跨】【星】【系】【通】【讯】【的】【装】【置】，【这】【样】【以】【后】【无】【论】【是】【图】【片】、【语】【音】【还】【有】【网】【络】，【完】【全】【可】【以】【在】【不】【同】【星】【系】【只】【见】【进】【行】【传】【输】。 【所】【以】【当】【萧】【越】【白】【教】【会】【女】【王】【大】【人】【自】【拍】【和】P【图】【之】
【距】【离】【御】【灵】【活】【动】【结】【束】【的】【最】【后】【一】【天】，【有】【了】【之】【前】【一】【天】【的】【经】【验】，【凡】【尘】【会】【同】【吹】【水】【家】【族】【的】【都】【选】【择】【了】【最】【后】【的】【消】【停】。 【这】【游】【戏】【就】【是】【这】【样】，【伤】【敌】【一】【千】【自】【损】【八】【百】。 【平】【时】【随】【随】【便】【便】【玩】【玩】【倒】【还】【好】，【可】【这】【次】【关】【系】【到】【御】【灵】【系】【统】【的】【首】【波】【体】【验】【权】，【自】【然】【是】【不】【能】【掉】【以】【轻】【心】。 【李】【浮】【白】【虽】【然】【人】【去】【出】【差】【了】，【可】【是】【考】【虑】【到】【建】【材】【问】【题】，【也】【提】【早】【留】【下】【资】【金】【喊】【话】【长】【生】